Liquidity Risk and Limited Arbitrage: Why Banks Lend to Opaque Hedge Funds
نویسنده
چکیده
Hedge funds attempting to take advantage of market-wide liquidity shocks are not limited by opaqueness-caused capital constraints, because banks optimally supply them with backup credit lines. During such shocks, government-protected bank deposits receive inflows that lower a bank’s opportunity cost of lending. The inflows also provide a private signal that helps the bank estimate the timing and magnitude of a shock, thus reducing the information asymmetry constraining hedge funds. The unique combination of exclusive low funding cost and sophisticated information gives banks an advantage in lending to hedge funds. ∗Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467. I am grateful to Pierluigi Balduzzi, Lily Fang, Wayne Ferson, Edie Hotchkiss, Ning Gong, Ed Kane, Alan Marcus, Jeff Pontiff, Matt Spiegel, Phil Strahan, Marti Subrahmanayan, seminar participants at Boston College, INSEAD, University of Amsterdam and CICF 2007 meeting participants for helpful discussions and suggestions.
منابع مشابه
Noise as Information for Illiquidity
We propose a broad measure of liquidity for the overall financial market by exploiting its connection with the amount of arbitrage capital in the market and the potential impact on price deviations in US Treasurys. When arbitrage capital is abundant, we expect the arbitrage forces to smooth out the Treasury yield curve and keep the dispersion low. During market crises, the shortage of arbitrage...
متن کاملCan Hedge Funds Time Market Liquidity?
This paper examines how hedge funds manage their market risk according to changes in aggregate liquidity conditions. Using a large sample of equity-oriented hedge funds during the period of 1994–2008, we find strong evidence that hedge-fund managers possess the ability to time market liquidity at both the style category level and the individual fund level. They increase (decrease) their portfol...
متن کاملFunding Liquidity Risk and the Dynamics of Hedge Fund Lockups
We exploit the expiring nature of hedge fund lockups to create a dynamic, fund-level proxy of funding liquidity risk. In contrast to the prior literature, our measure allows us to identify how within-fund changes in funding liquidity risk are associated with performance and risk taking. Lockup funds with lower funding liquidity risk take more tail risk and have better risk-adjusted performance,...
متن کاملLiquidity Spillovers in Hedge Funds: Evidence from the Holdings of Funds of Hedge Funds
We examine whether funds of hedge funds (FoFs) engage in costly fire sales of their hedge fund investments during the 2004–2011 period. We find that FoFs experiencing large outflows tend to liquidate holdings in funds with relatively few redemption restrictions (“liquid funds”), even when these funds perform well. A tracking portfolio that buys liquid funds involved in fire sales over the prior...
متن کاملOptimal Portfolio Allocations with Hedge Funds∗
This paper analyzes optimal investment decisions, in the presence of non-redundant hedge funds, for investors with constant relative risk aversion. Factor regression models with optionlike risk factors and no-arbitrage principles are used to identify and estimate the market price of hedge fund risk, the volatility coefficients of hedge fund returns and the correlation between hedge fund and mar...
متن کامل